World News – 2024 – Video Playlist | Video Playlists | Sites: | newsandtimes.org | links-newsandtimes.com | worldwebtimes.com | southcaucasusnews.com | russianworld.net | jossica.com | octobersurprise2016.org | bklyntimes.com | oceanavenuenews.com | fbireform.com | bloggersunite.net | octobersurprise-2024.org | Trump-News.org | Audio-Posts.com | Bklyn-NY.com | Posts Review – newsandtimes.org | Capitol-Riot.com |
The News And Times Review – NewsAndTimes.org
Selected Posts: Gusinsky, Lesin, and the FBI: The Goose and his Revenge: The Investigation in tweets
November 15, 2025
Current News Review Links
Current News Review Links – GN
from The News and Times
- Michael Novakhov on X: “Current News Review Links
- Posts Review – The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default
- The News And Times Blog In Brief
- ________________________
- News Review Summaries in AI Mode
-
Current News – currentnewschannels.blogspot.com – Blog by Michael Novakhov
- Main News Now
- Summary of main Trump News today
- Russia-Ukraine War News Today
- FBI news today
- Notable Opinions Today: editorials, op-eds, columns, articles
- Google News
- All News – Current News Review
- Articles and Tweets – Current News Review
- Collections
- Blogs
- Audio News Review
-
The News and Opinions Podcast
- Video News Review
- Video – YouTube Searches
- Video and Audio News Review | Video по-русски
- Michael Novakhov on X: “Video – YouTube Searches
- Security and Intelligence News Review
- Russia and Ukraine News Review
- South Caucasus
- Brooklyn, N.Y. News
- Israel and Middle East News Review
- FBI News FBI news today FBI Videos and Playlist
-
Sites
-
Selected AI Conversations
-
- REVIEW: Operation Trump: The New Abwehr – Mossad Hypothesis
-
Trump and Netanyahu — a match made in heaven? | The Times of Israel
–Operation Trump: The New Abwehr – Mossad Hypothesis
https://thenewsandtimes.blogspot.com/2024/01/trump-netanyahu-ring-links-to-tweet.html
https://twitter.com/mikenov/status/1746213494922371160
#News #Times #NewsAndTimes #NT #TNT #Israel #World #USA #POTUS #DOJ #FBI #CIA #DIA #ODNI #Mossad #Putin #Russia #GRU #Ukraine #SouthCaucasus #NewAbwehr #Bloggers
Trump-Netanyahu ring who stole the Election 2016 smells of the ties with the Russian Speaking Israeli Jewish Organized CrimeGroup – the Criminal Russian Oligarchs, who are all connected, one way or the other, with the KGB. So, every one is correct from the investigative point of view: It is Mafia + KGB + Russia + Israel.
The Supreme Manager and Designer of this structure and its operations is the New Abwehr, IMHO.
google.com/search?newwindThe Hypothesis of Israeli Interference in the US Elections 2016 thenewsandtimes.blogspot.com/2024/01/the-hy
Mossad collected various US government emails for years prior to 2016 with the help of its many human assets. During 2016 campaign it released the Clintons emails via various “Leaks”, in the attempt to portray her as “unreliable” and to hurt her election chances. In the process it developed various covers, mostly Russia, with whom it had the agreement to cooperate. Jared Kushner the agent of Mossad, adapted their algorithms for the US elections. And finally, it orchestrated the October Surprise 2016: it set up Anthony Weiner and inserted Clinton’s emails into his laptop, in the attempt to portray Huma Abedin as treacherous. It coordinated closely with the “Trump-Land” FBI via James Kallstrom and Charles McGonigal, who was set up later for a fall guy, in addition to many others previously. The US Government should investigate this and the related hypotheses carefully, and the findings should be published after the proper investigations, filling out the blank spots. It will be good for both the US and Israel. These arrogant, stab in the back, Mossad shenanigans have to stop!
Michael Novakhov
5:43 AM 1/17/2024
Links
Israeli Interference in the US Elections 2016 – GS–Forensic exam of the Weiner’s Laptop: It was requested by the FBI in 2016 but it remains unclear if it was performed, how it was performed, by whom, and what are the results of it. Were there any signs of the cyber intrusion and the unauthorized cyber insertion of about 650,000 Clinton emails leaked earlier? I asked this question about a year ago, but there still no answers. This issue is of the primary importance in the task of the understanding the October Surprise 2016, its origins, true circumstances, and true causes. It is very important but a very simple question, requiring “yes or no” answer, to which the American people are fully entitled. Please, answer it!
https://twitter.com/mikenov/status/1747653565374488627
Ukrainian drone unit destroys Russian T-72B3 tank near Bakhmut – Selected Articles thenewsandtimes.blogspot.com/2024/01/ukrainOperation Trump: The New Abwehr – Mossad Hypothesis
Related Links:
Current Tweets: Operation Trump: The New Abwehr – Mossad Hypothesis
TNT Blog in brief posts
AI Mode – AI Mode history
AI Assessment: The undue political influence on Presidential Elections: Former FBI Agents Organizations and their political power
“Undue political influence” on presidential elections by both active and former FBI agents and their organizations is a subject of significant debate and public concern, with allegations that some individuals and organizations have at times acted in ways that were perceived as politically biased or as attempts to influence election outcomes. [1, 2] Key points regarding the influence and political power of these groups include: Perceptions of Politicization: Public opinion regarding the FBI and its personnel has become increasingly polarized along partisan lines, with a significant percentage of voters believing the agency has been “politically weaponized”. This perception often stems from high-profile investigations related to presidential candidates, such as the Hillary Clinton email inquiry in 2016 or investigations into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia. Actions by Active and Former Agents: High-Profile Incidents: Specific incidents involving active agents, such as the text messages exchanged between former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page that disparaged Donald Trump, fueled claims of political bias and undue influence. .Public Statements and Advocacy:Organizations like the FBI Agents Association (FBIAA), which is nonpartisan but represents the interests of active agents, engage in legislative advocacy and have issued public letters raising concerns over matters they perceive as political interference in the bureau’s operations, such as the summary termination of agents without due process Post-Government Activity: Former agents, once out of government service, are not bound by the same political activity restrictions (like the Hatch Act for most active agents) and may engage in political commentary or seek public office, contributing to the broader perception of the “political power” of the FBI community as a whole. Formal Political Power Limitations: Active FBI agents are generally subject to the Hatch Act and Department of Justice policies that severely restrict their partisan political activities and the use of their official authority to interfere with or affect election results. The FBI officially emphasizes its commitment to protecting election integrity and conducting its mission without political bias. Historical Context: The FBI has a long history of being involved in political controversies, dating back to the J. Edgar Hoover era, highlighting the ongoing tension between ensuring law enforcement independence and preventing political manipulation. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13] Ultimately, while formal organizations of former FBI agents do not hold direct, official power over the electoral process, their public statements, advocacy, and the actions of high-profile former agents contribute to a narrative and perception of influence that is often debated in the context of presidential elections. [12, 13]
AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] congress.gov/118/meeting/ho [2] usatoday.com/story/news/pol [3] yahoo.com/news/articles/ [4] justice.gov/jmd/political- [5] vox.com/the-big-idea/2 [6] time.com/6235552/the-fb [7] fbi.gov/how-we-can-hel [8] hageman.house.gov/media/in-the-n [9] repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewconten [10] apmresearchlab.org/motn-fbi-trust [11] fbiaa.org/fbiaa-letter-t [12] abcnews.go.com/US/ahead-elect [13] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FBI_Agent
The undue political influence on Presidential Elections: Former FBI Agents Organizations and their political power 3 minutes ago .”Former FBI Agents Organizations,” such as the Society of Former Special Agents of the FBI and the FBI Agents Association, do not typically wield direct, undue political influence on presidential elections in an official, coordinated manner. Their influence is generally limited to professional advocacy and the individual actions and public statements of their members However, the question of undue political influence in elections related to the FBI is a subject of significant ongoing public and political debate, primarily focusing on: Actions by current and former high-level FBI officials (acting as individuals, not on behalf of a formal “agents organization”) whose public statements or actions during an election cycle have been criticized as politically motivated or as having an impact on voters’ perceptions. A prominent example is the controversy surrounding former Director James Comey’s public statements regarding the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails in 2016. Allegations of institutional bias and “weaponization” of federal law enforcement, which have been raised by some political figures and commentators, often citing internal communications (like text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page) or whistleblower testimony as evidence of bias against certain candidates. Advocacy and lobbying efforts by professional associations, which typically focus on issues such as pay, benefits, and working conditions for agents, rather than partisan endorsements in presidential elections. The FBI Agents Association engages in legislative advocacy, but its primary role is professional, not overtly political in the context of partisan elections. The Hatch Act, which generally prohibits federal employees, including FBI agents, from using their official authority or influence to affect the result of an election or engage in political activity while on duty. In summary, while the actions of specific individuals with ties to the FBI have been highly scrutinized for their potential impact on elections, there is no evidence that the formal organizations of former FBI agents, as collective entities, exert undue political power in presidential elections beyond typical professional advocacy and public commentary.
Bloggers, Unite!Bloggers, Unite! – The News And Times | Free News Reviews RSS Feeds For Your Blog! | On Twitter: #Bloggers