Day: September 24, 2025

🚨⚡️ Lavrov-Rubio talks are OVER — lasted 50 mins

CNN asks Russia’s FM how meeting went

This is his response pic.twitter.com/b0e7BP9agL

— RussiaNews 🇷🇺 (@mog_russEN) September 24, 2025

Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa:

I extend my gratitude to everyone who aided Syrians and welcomed them in their countries.

I particularly thank Türkiye, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, all Arab and Islamic states, EU and the US. pic.twitter.com/lWFsLzGuB1

— Clash Report (@clashreport) September 24, 2025

BREAKING:

President Trump orders members of NATO countries to shot down Russian aircrafts if they enter their spaces. pic.twitter.com/TMp6Uc8Eap

— World Affairs (@World_Affairs11) September 24, 2025

#POTUS  #CIA  #FBI  #StateDept
Selected Tweets x.com/mikenov/status/1970880456443990291

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 24, 2025

Prophet Abraham and the Potemkin Villages of Jared Kushner – Selected Tweets – Collection  thenewsandtimes.blogspot.com…

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 24, 2025

October 7 Attack: Truth, Conspiracies, and searching for Consensus – Google Search  google.com/search?num=10&new…

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 24, 2025

October 7 Attack: Truth, Conspiracies, and searching for Consensus  g.co/gemini/share/cfe723ba57…
Doctor Netanyahu: You made the fundamental diagnostic error, and imposed it on the whole of Israel and on the world. The October 7 is not a primary Hamas operation, they did not even know about it. Behind October 7 is Putin, his GRU, his Wagner Group, and other intelligence services under his control. They trained and used Hamas as their assault paratroopers, the foot soldiers in  this military intelligence assault operation, very sophisticated, long, for years  planned, and very carefully and masterfully thought out. CONDUCT THE INDEPENDENT INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATION OF THE OCTOBER 7 ATTACK!

This text presents a specific and highly controversial viewpoint regarding the October 7th attack on Israel. Let’s break down the claims and compare them with the widely accepted understanding of the event.

The Mainstream and Consensus View

The overwhelming consensus among Israeli, United States, and other Western intelligence agencies, as well as investigative journalists and regional experts, is that the October 7th attack was planned and executed by Hamas, with significant long-term support from Iran.

Hamas’s Agency: The planning for the attack, known by Hamas as “Operation Al-Aqsa Flood,” was reportedly years in the making. It was directed by Hamas’s leadership, particularly Yahya Sinwar in Gaza and Mohammed Deif, the head of its military wing, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades. The operation demonstrated a high level of indigenous planning, operational security, and coordination by Hamas militants.
Iranian Support: Iran is widely recognized as Hamas’s primary state sponsor. This support includes funding, weapons, and training.1 While the exact level of Iran’s direct involvement in the specific timing and execution of the October 7th attack is debated, its strategic role in enabling Hamas’s military capabilities is not in doubt.
Israel’s Position: The official position of the Israeli government and its security establishment is that Hamas is directly responsible, with Iran as its main backer.

Analysis of the Claims in the Quote

The viewpoint you’ve shared contradicts the mainstream consensus in several key areas:

“Not a primary Hamas operation, they did not even know about it.” This is the most extreme claim and is directly refuted by all available evidence. Hamas immediately claimed responsibility for the attack, and its own fighters carried it out. The idea that the foot soldiers were unaware of the operation they were participating in is not credible.

“Behind October 7 is Putin, his GRU, his Wagner Group…” This allegation places the blame on Russia. While it is true that Russia has complex relationships in the Middle East and has hosted Hamas delegations in Moscow, there has been no credible, publicly presented evidence from any major intelligence agency to support the claim that Russia orchestrated or commanded the attack.
Geopolitical Motive: Proponents of this theory often argue that the attack served Russia’s interests by distracting the United States and its allies from the war in Ukraine and creating instability for the West.
Lack of Evidence: Despite the potential motive, Western and Israeli officials have consistently pointed to Iran, not Russia, as the key state actor behind Hamas.
“Trained and used Hamas as their assault paratroopers…” This suggests a proxy relationship where Hamas was merely a tool for Russian military intelligence. While Hamas fighters have received training from various sources over the years, including Iran and its proxies like Hezbollah, attributing their direction to Russia’s GRU is a fringe theory that is not supported by evidence.
The Call for an Investigation

The quote ends with a call for an “independent international investigation.” Calls for such investigations are common after major international incidents. Currently, several bodies are conducting investigations related to the October 7th attack and the subsequent war, including:

Israel’s internal state commission of inquiry.

Investigations by the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) into alleged war crimes and genocide by both parties in the broader conflict.
In summary, the text you provided outlines a conspiracy theory that shifts responsibility for the October 7th attack from Hamas and its primary backer, Iran, to Russia. This viewpoint is not supported by evidence and stands in stark contrast to the findings of Israeli, U.S., and allied intelligence services.

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 24, 2025

Bibi the Hero against the world: master of the political survival – Google Search  google.com/search?q=Bibi+the…
Ai Overview
Analysis of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu’s political survival reveals a leader who has repeatedly overcome immense challenges by consolidating power, leveraging media narratives, and portraying himself as the country’s essential protector. This narrative has become particularly central since the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack and the subsequent wars.
A master of political maneuvering
Netanyahu has maintained his position as Israel’s longest-serving prime minister through a consistent and highly effective political strategy.

Polarizing the electorate: His tactics often involve polarizing the public discourse by framing conflicts as a struggle against a liberal, anti-Israel “Deep State.” By emphasizing divisions, he reinforces his narrative that he is the only leader capable of defending the nation against both external enemies and internal critics.
Controlling the narrative: Netanyahu has a long history of controlling the media narrative, using his influence to ensure favorable coverage. Since October 7, 2023, his supporters have rallied around his wartime leadership, temporarily muting some internal dissent.
Keeping rivals off-balance: He has mastered the art of “divide and survive” by neutralizing potential threats from within his own right-wing bloc and from the political opposition. In 2025, his government continues to be sustained by hardline coalition partners, whose threats to resign give him cover to pursue aggressive military policies.

Navigating constant crises
Netanyahu’s resilience has been tested by a series of ongoing political crises, especially since his return to power in late 2022.

Pre-war protests: In early 2023, his government faced massive, sustained protests over a controversial judicial overhaul plan that critics claimed was an attempt to subvert democratic institutions to protect him from his corruption trial.
Corruption trial: Netanyahu’s long-running trial on charges of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust remains a major liability. He has characterized the legal proceedings as a politically motivated witch hunt. His ability to delay the proceedings and consolidate power despite the charges highlights his political shrewdness.
The aftermath of October 7: The attack was widely seen as a catastrophic security failure on his watch, leading to intense public criticism and protest movements demanding his resignation. However, the subsequent wars have enabled him to deflect blame and re-center his political narrative around national security.

2025: A high-stakes balancing act
In 2025, Netanyahu continues to demonstrate his survival skills amid complex military and diplomatic challenges.

Prolonging the wars: Many analysts argue that Netanyahu has prolonged the wars in Gaza and Lebanon—and escalated tensions with Iran—for his own political survival. Critics claim these actions distract from his pre-war failures and appease his hardline coalition partners.
International isolation: Israel faces growing international criticism and isolation due to its military actions, a trend that accelerated after the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued a request for arrest warrants for Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders in May 2024.
Growing domestic dissent: Despite the wartime unity, domestic dissent has been steadily growing. Protests supporting a hostage deal continue, and criticism from former security officials and military reservists is increasingly prominent. Some critics accuse Netanyahu of prioritizing his political needs over the return of hostages.

The “hero against the world” narrative
The phrase “Bibi the Hero against the world” reflects a core tenet of Netanyahu’s appeal to his base.

External threat emphasis: By focusing on external threats, such as Iran’s nuclear program and Hamas, he positions himself as the only leader with the resolve and experience to protect Israel.
Deflecting criticism: He frames international condemnation as a sign that the world is against Israel and that he is simply a strong, patriotic leader defending his country from its critics. This helps him dismiss negative press and international pressure as anti-Israel bias.
Cementing loyalty: This narrative creates a sense of siege among his supporters, strengthening their loyalty and making them resistant to criticism from both domestic and foreign opponents.
–

AI Mode
Bibi the Hero against the world: master of the political survival
. His tenure continues against a backdrop of a deeply unpopular war in Gaza, ongoing corruption trials, and an International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant, which have spurred major public dissent but have not yet fractured his ruling coalition.Based on events through September 2025, Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu’s political survival is defined by his ability to maintain power despite significant domestic and international challenges
The political context for Netanyahu’s survival
Reliance on a far-right coalition: Netanyahu’s current government, formed in late 2022, is the most right-wing and religiously conservative in Israel’s history. The survival of his coalition depends on his ability to balance the conflicting demands of his hard-line partners, particularly regarding the war in Gaza, judicial reforms, and the expansion of settlements in the West Bank.
The October 7 security failure: Many Israelis hold Netanyahu accountable for the October 7, 2023, attack by Hamas, which exposed a catastrophic security failure. Polls have consistently shown that a majority of Israelis want him to resign.
Corruption trials: His corruption trial, which began in 2020, continues to unfold, with testimony from Netanyahu beginning in December 2024 and continuing into 2025. This legal jeopardy adds to the public’s distrust and fuels calls for his removal.
ICC arrest warrant: In November 2024, the ICC issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity related to the Gaza conflict. The U.S., a key ally, is considering sanctions on the ICC in response, complicating diplomatic efforts.
Ongoing conflicts: Since the start of the war with Hamas, Israel has also engaged in war with Iran and Hezbollah, involving strikes and counterstrikes. These conflicts have increased regional tensions and focused international scrutiny on Netanyahu’s actions.
Tactics for political survival
Netanyahu has utilized several tactics to maintain power amidst these crises.
Focus on external threats: By portraying the war against Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran as an existential struggle for Israel’s survival, Netanyahu attempts to rally his nationalist base and shift the focus away from his government’s failures.
Avoid immediate elections: Netanyahu has successfully blocked early elections, buying his government more time to navigate the war and political challenges. His far-right coalition partners are also highly motivated to avoid elections, as they would likely lose power.
Exploit divisions: He has historically managed to pit rivals against one another and capitalize on internal divisions within the opposition to prevent a unified front against him.
Deflect responsibility: When faced with criticism, Netanyahu and his allies have attempted to deflect responsibility for the October 7 attacks onto military and security officials.
Undermine judicial oversight: The judicial overhaul pushed by his government in 2023, which sparked massive protests, was widely seen as an attempt to weaken the judiciary and gain leverage in his corruption trials.
Current state of his political survival
As of September 2025, Netanyahu continues to hold power, but his position remains precarious and politically costly.
Low public trust: Polls show public trust in Netanyahu remains low, even among Jewish Israelis.
International isolation: International confidence in Netanyahu is at a record low, with negative views recorded across many countries.
Deepening divisions: Growing rifts between Netanyahu and his security chiefs, as well as dissent within his own cabinet and party, signal increasing pressure from within his government.
High stakes: His decisions are viewed as increasingly linked to his personal political and legal survival, with critics accusing him of prolonging the war to stay in office.
AI responses may include mistakes.

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 24, 2025

Netanyahu’s Political Survival Strategy  g.co/gemini/share/e46998534b…
Netanyahu: A Political Survivor’s Saga of ‘Bibi Against the World’

Jerusalem – For decades, Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu has not just occupied the center of Israeli politics, but has often positioned himself as its defiant vanguard against a world he portrays as frequently hostile to the Jewish state. His long and tumultuous career, marked by both soaring triumphs and profound crises, has solidified his image among supporters as a heroic protector of Israel’s interests, while critics decry him as a divisive and cynical operator who thrives on conflict.1 This “Bibi against the world” narrative, a cornerstone of his political persona, has proven to be a remarkably effective tool for his political survival.

Netanyahu’s political longevity is undeniable. He is Israel’s longest-serving prime minister, having held the office for a cumulative total of over 16 years.2 His career has been a masterclass in political maneuvering, coalition-building, and, crucially, in harnessing a sense of national siege to his political advantage.

This narrative often casts Netanyahu as the lone statesman willing to make the tough, unpopular decisions necessary to safeguard Israel’s security in a hostile region. A key example is his vociferous and sustained opposition to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal.3 While major world powers, including the United States under President Barack Obama, championed the agreement as a landmark diplomatic achievement, Netanyahu relentlessly campaigned against it, famously addressing a joint session of the U.S.4 Congress in a direct challenge to the American administration. To his supporters, this was a courageous act of a leader prioritizing his nation’s existential security above all else. To his detractors, it was a reckless and partisan move that alienated a key ally.

Similarly, on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Netanyahu has consistently projected an image of a steadfast leader unbowed by international pressure to make concessions he deems dangerous. His governments have overseen the significant expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, a policy widely condemned by the international community as a violation of international law and an obstacle to a two-state solution.5 Despite resolutions from the United Nations and criticism from even close allies, Netanyahu has framed this policy as a non-negotiable right of the Jewish people to build in their historic homeland, reinforcing the “us against the world” mentality.

Domestically, this approach has often translated into a political strategy of rallying his base against perceived internal and external enemies. He has frequently lashed out at the media, the judiciary, and left-wing political opponents, portraying them as part of an elite establishment that is out of touch with the will of the people and too willing to capitulate to international dictates.6 This has been particularly evident during his ongoing corruption trial, which he has characterized as a politically motivated “witch hunt” orchestrated by his adversaries to oust him from power.7

Even in the face of significant challenges that would have ended the careers of many politicians – including multiple rounds of inconclusive elections, the formation of a short-lived “change” government that ousted him from power in 2021, and the devastating intelligence and security failures that led to the October 7th attacks – Netanyahu has demonstrated a remarkable capacity to endure.8 His return to the premiership in late 2022, at the helm of one of the most right-wing governments in Israel’s history, was a testament to his political resilience.9

The recent war in Gaza has further amplified the “Bibi against the world” narrative. As international condemnation of Israel’s military campaign has mounted, with accusations of disproportionate force and a humanitarian catastrophe, Netanyahu has remained defiant, insisting that Israel is acting in self-defense against a genocidal enemy and that the world is applying a double standard.10 This stance has resonated with a significant portion of the Israeli public who feel the world does not understand the threats they face.

However, this strategy of political survival is not without its costs. Critics argue that Netanyahu’s constant portrayal of Israel as a victimized and isolated nation has deepened internal divisions, eroded democratic norms, and strained crucial relationships with international partners. They contend that his focus on short-term political gains has often come at the expense of long-term strategic thinking and a genuine pursuit of peace.

In the end, the narrative of “Bibi the Hero against the world” is a complex and deeply polarizing one. For his ardent supporters, he is the indispensable leader, a modern-day Churchillian figure standing firm against the forces of darkness.11 For his opponents, he is a master of political manipulation who has expertly exploited fear and division to maintain his grip on power.12 What is beyond dispute is that this carefully crafted persona has been central to the enduring and consequential political career of Benjamin Netanyahu.
–
Picture:
Bibi the Hero against the world: master of the political survival – GS

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 24, 2025