Day: January 20, 2026

#Trump #DOJ #Amendment25
My opinion: Trump is fit, and so is his Prime Minister and other Ministers.
On a deeper level, that’s for the future historians to determine.
x.com/mikenov/status/2013576…Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) #Trump #DOJ #Amendment25

25th Amendment for Trump’s Fitness gemini.google.com/share/df2c…

The provided article from The Daily Beast argues that the 25th Amendment should be invoked to remove Donald Trump from office, citing a recent diplomatic communication as evidence of mental incapacity.

The core of the argument centers on a letter sent to Norway’s Prime Minister, Jonas Gahr Støre. In the letter, Trump expresses frustration over not receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, suggesting that because he was “snubbed,” he no longer feels obligated to prioritize peace. He specifically targets Greenland, questioning Denmark’s right of ownership and asserting that “Complete and Total Control of Greenland” is necessary for world security.

The author, Janna Brancolini, presents several key points to support the call for the 25th Amendment:

Emotional Volatility: The article contends it is irrational to threaten international stability or propose major territorial acquisitions based on personal grievances over an award.
Geopolitical Risks: The piece argues that the President’s rhetoric undermines the NATO alliance and emboldens adversaries like Russia and China by questioning the collective defense agreements that protect territories like Greenland.
Health Concerns: Brancolini references previous reports of physical and cognitive decline, including instances of “word salad,” physical symptoms like bruised hands, and an erratic sleep schedule filled with social media “rage-posting.”
Impeachment vs. 25th Amendment: The article distinguishes between the two, suggesting that while his actions may be impeachable, the primary issue is a fundamental inability to “discharge the powers and duties of his office” due to a lack of mental stability.

The article acknowledges the significant political hurdles to this process, noting that the Cabinet is largely composed of loyalists and that congressional Republicans have shown little interest in reining in the administration. However, it concludes that discussing the 25th Amendment is necessary to address what the author describes as a “collective delusion” regarding the President’s fitness for office.— https://x.com/mikenov/status/2013576282106105908

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Jan 20, 2026

Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) / Twitter

#Trump #DOJ #Amendment25 25th Amendment for Trump’s Fitness https://gemini.google.com/share/df2c6c453572 The provided article from The Daily Beast argues that the 25th Amendment should be invoked to remove Donald Trump from office, citing a recent diplomatic communication as evidence of mental incapacity. The core of the argument centers on a letter sent to Norway’s Prime Minister, Jonas Gahr Støre. In the letter, Trump expresses frustration over not receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, suggesting that because he was “snubbed,” he no longer feels obligated to prioritize peace. He specifically targets Greenland, questioning Denmark’s right of ownership and asserting that “Complete and Total Contr

Post author By Mike Nova
Post date January 20, 2026

#Trump #DOJ #Amendment25

25th Amendment for Trump’s Fitness gemini.google.com/share/df2c…

The provided article from The Daily Beast argues that the 25th Amendment should be invoked to remove Donald Trump from office, citing a recent diplomatic communication as evidence of mental incapacity.

The core of the argument centers on a letter sent to Norway’s Prime Minister, Jonas Gahr Støre. In the letter, Trump expresses frustration over not receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, suggesting that because he was “snubbed,” he no longer feels obligated to prioritize peace. He specifically targets Greenland, questioning Denmark’s right of ownership and asserting that “Complete and Total Control of Greenland” is necessary for world security.

The author, Janna Brancolini, presents several key points to support the call for the 25th Amendment:

Emotional Volatility: The article contends it is irrational to threaten international stability or propose major territorial acquisitions based on personal grievances over an award.
Geopolitical Risks: The piece argues that the President’s rhetoric undermines the NATO alliance and emboldens adversaries like Russia and China by questioning the collective defense agreements that protect territories like Greenland.
Health Concerns: Brancolini references previous reports of physical and cognitive decline, including instances of “word salad,” physical symptoms like bruised hands, and an erratic sleep schedule filled with social media “rage-posting.”
Impeachment vs. 25th Amendment: The article distinguishes between the two, suggesting that while his actions may be impeachable, the primary issue is a fundamental inability to “discharge the powers and duties of his office” due to a lack of mental stability.

The article acknowledges the significant political hurdles to this process, noting that the Cabinet is largely composed of loyalists and that congressional Republicans have shown little interest in reining in the administration. However, it concludes that discussing the 25th Amendment is necessary to address what the author describes as a “collective delusion” regarding the President’s fitness for office.

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Jan 20, 2026