Investigations: Types, phenomenology, processes, outcomes, criteria for truth and solutions https://share.google/aimode/BNVnMtyXodaD2s1MG AI Overview Investigations are structured, systematic inquiries designed to uncover facts, establish truth, and resolve specific problems. They span various disciplines—including forensic, scientific, and workplace contexts—each employing specific methodologies tailored to the phenomenon being examined. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] 1. Types of Investigations Forensic/Criminal Investigation: Involves collecting and analyzing evidence to support legal proceedings, including homicide, arson, and financial crime investigations. Scientific/Forensic Science: Uses methods fro

Investigations: Types, phenomenology, processes, outcomes, criteria for truth and solutions
share.google/aimode/BNVnMtyX…
AI Overview
Investigations are structured, systematic inquiries designed to uncover facts, establish truth, and resolve specific problems. They span various disciplines—including forensic, scientific, and workplace contexts—each employing specific methodologies tailored to the phenomenon being examined. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
1. Types of Investigations

Forensic/Criminal Investigation: Involves collecting and analyzing evidence to support legal proceedings, including homicide, arson, and financial crime investigations.
Scientific/Forensic Science: Uses methods from chemistry, biology, and physics to analyze evidence (e.g., DNA, toxicology, trace evidence) to identify perpetrators or exonerate innocent individuals.
Digital Forensic Investigation: Focuses on recovering and examining data from digital devices to address cybercrime.
Workplace/Internal Investigations: Conducted by Human Resources to address allegations of misconduct, harassment, or policy violations.
Phenomenological Investigation: A qualitative research approach aimed at understanding the “lived experience” of individuals, focusing on the meaning they assign to phenomena. [2, 6, 7, 8, 9]

2. Phenomenology of Investigations
Phenomenology in investigation emphasizes that the “reality” of an event is often constructed through the perceptions and experiences of those involved.

Lived Experience: Focuses on what was experienced and how it was experienced, rather than just the objective facts.
Bracketing: Researchers “bracket” or set aside their own preconceptions to ensure the investigation captures the participant’s true perspective.
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): Analyzes the “double hermeneutic,” where researchers try to make sense of participants trying to make sense of their own experiences. [1, 6, 11, 12, 13]

3. Investigative Processes
A standard investigation follows a logical progression, regardless of the field:

Intake & Initial Assessment: Receiving the complaint and determining if an investigation is necessary.
Planning: Defining the scope, selecting an investigator, and planning, and identifying necessary resources.
Data Collection & Evidence Gathering: Secure the scene (the “golden rule” of never altering it), conducting interviews (witnesses, suspects), collecting physical/digital evidence.
Analysis: Evaluating evidence using scientific methods, identifying patterns, and checking for bias.
Reporting & Conclusion: Documenting findings and delivering a final report. [14, 16, 17, 18]

4. Outcomes of Investigations

Substantiated: The allegations are supported by evidence.
Unsubstantiated: Insufficient evidence exists to prove the allegations.
Exoneration/Exclusion: Evidence clears a suspect of suspicion.
Individualization: A forensic finding that a particular item or person is the unique source of an unknown item of evidence.
Corrective Action: Implementation of changes (e.g., policy updates, training) to prevent future incidents. [7, 8, 18, 19]

5. Criteria for Truth and Solutions
Investigations aim for accuracy and reliability in their conclusions.

Scientific Evidence: The “truth” in forensic investigation is often based on the scientific method and empirical data (e.g., Locard’s exchange principle: “Every contact leaves a trace”).
Objectivity & Impartiality: Investigations must be unbiased, relying on facts rather than pre-conceived notions.
Chain of Custody: Proper documentation of evidence handling to ensure its integrity in court.
Triangulation: Verifying findings by comparing multiple sources of evidence.
Solutions: Effective investigations identify root causes rather than just symptoms, often leading to recommendations that prevent recurrence. [1, 8, 21, 22, 23]

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1]  pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article…
[2]  alliant.edu/blog/the-differe…
[3]  emerald.com/books/edited-vol…
[4]  taproot.com/evidence-collect…
[5]  w-z.com/2017/06/16/tools-of-…
[6]  unimelb.libguides.com/whichs…
[7]  justice.gov/archives/dag/for…
[8]  cmu.edu/hr/resources/workpla…
[9]  cpp.edu/officeofequity/docum…
[10]  dovetail.com/research/phenom…
[11]  youtube.com/watch?v=5YM8Xxs8…
[12]  study.com/learn/lesson/pheno…
[13]  trymata.com/blog/what-is-phe…
[14]  hrcertification.com/blog/wor…
[15]  lan-portal.uob.edu.ly/data/P…
[16]  nist.gov/forensic-science
[17]  pressbooks.bccampus.ca/crimi…
[18]  evolvetraining.com/news/6-st…
[19]  pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article…
[20]  prochefkitchentools.com/blog…
[21]  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forens…
[22]  amu.apus.edu/area-of-study/c…
[23]  risktec.tuv.com/knowledge-ba…

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) May 1, 2026