World News – 2024 – Video Playlist | Video Playlists | Sites: | newsandtimes.org | links-newsandtimes.com | worldwebtimes.com | southcaucasusnews.com | russianworld.net | jossica.com | octobersurprise2016.org | bklyntimes.com | oceanavenuenews.com | fbireform.com | bloggersunite.net | octobersurprise-2024.org | Trump-News.org | Audio-Posts.com | Bklyn-NY.com | Posts Review – newsandtimes.org | Capitol-Riot.com |
The News And Times Review – NewsAndTimes.org
Mikhail Gorbachev freed the famous dissident Andrei Sakharov
(a Nobel Peace Prize-winning nuclear physicist and human rights champion, had been confined to the closed city of Gorky since 1980 for criticizing the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan) from internal exile in December 1986. In a historic move that signaled his new policy of glasnost (openness), Gorbachev personally telephoned Sakharov to tell him that he and his wife, Yelena Bonner, were free to return to Moscow. Shortly after releasing Sakharov, Gorbachev expanded his political reforms by freeing hundreds of other high-profile dissidents and “refuseniks”….A telephone appeared in a dissident’s apartment after years of enforced isolation. On December 15, 1986, Soviet physicist Andrei Sakharov and his wife, Yelena Bonner, received an unexpected visit from technicians accompanied by a KGB officer. They installed a telephone in the couple’s apartment in the closed city of Gorky, where Sakharov had been held in internal exile since 1980. The following afternoon, the telephone rang. At the other end was Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, informing Sakharov that he and his wife would be allowed to return to Moscow.
Sakharov was internationally famous for his scientific work on Soviet nuclear weapons and his increasingly public defense of human rights. He had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1975, an honor Soviet authorities prevented him from collecting in person. His criticism of political repression and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan brought him into direct conflict with the government. In January 1980, he was sent without trial to Gorky, a city closed to most foreigners. Isolation there made contact with Western diplomats and journalists difficult. The KGB closely monitored his movements and communications, while his public dissent continued to infuriate the authorities.
Exile did not silence him. Sakharov protested restrictions on himself and Bonner and undertook hunger strikes over matters involving their family and personal freedom. His treatment included forced hospitalization and other coercive measures. Bonner became central to his ability to communicate with the outside world, carrying information and defending their rights despite intense pressure. The authorities periodically restricted correspondence, visits and telephone access. By the mid-1980s, Sakharov had become a prominent symbol of the broader Soviet problem of prisoners of conscience: people punished not for ordinary violent crimes but for expressing political or moral opposition to the state.
Gorbachev’s rise to power in March 1985 gradually altered the political landscape. He pursued reforms intended to address economic stagnation and improve Soviet governance while also seeking better relations with Western countries. The continued confinement of a Nobel laureate was an international embarrassment and a test of the sincerity of the new leadership’s promises. Sakharov had written to Gorbachev urging the release of political prisoners. In December 1986, the death of dissident Anatoly Marchenko following a prolonged hunger strike added urgency to the issue. It was in this atmosphere that the Soviet leadership decided to end Sakharov’s exile.
The details of the telephone call are unusually well documented. In his later account, Sakharov recalled the technicians arriving on December 15 and installing the telephone under security supervision. On December 16, the anticipated call came at approximately three in the afternoon. Gorbachev personally told him he could return to Moscow and resume his scientific work. Sakharov responded by raising the fate of other political prisoners, refusing to treat his own release as a complete solution. The conversation therefore went beyond an announcement of personal freedom. It also exposed the continuing disagreement between the dissident and the Soviet leadership over human rights.
— @archeohistories Oct 17, 2026

