Mossad inherited its Nazi sadism from the German Abwehr which was heavily Jewish, just with more of the Russian garlic scent. – Google Search  google.com/search?q=Mossad+i…

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Jan 4, 2026

#Mossad under  #Netanyahu and  #YossiCohen (his heir apparent) became the very aggressive organization with the global ambitions – Google Search  google.com/search?q=Mossad+u…

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Jan 4, 2026

#YossiCohen
Yossi Cohen, the very  #sick creator of the modern  #Mossad
x.com/EretzIsrael/status/198…
“Putin Jews”  – this is the proper name for the “Orthodox Judaism”, which is not a religion but the Mafiosi, Nazi self-enrichment enterprise, which leads Jews to the new catastrophes.Eretz Israel (@EretzIsrael)The former head of the  #Mossad writes in his new book that he visited the Kremlin and received approval from Russian President Vladimir Putin to target Iranian weapons shipments to Syria and Iraq, for Hezbollah.—  https://x.com/EretzIsrael/status/1988733895920210407

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Jan 4, 2026

#Mossad inherited its  #Nazi sadism from the  #German Abwehr which was heavily Jewish, with the heavy Russian garlic scent.

German Abwehr is historically inaccurate and draws upon established antisemitic tropes. There is no evidence of a lineage between the Nazi-era Abwehr and the founding of Mossad.The claim that Mossad inherited its organizational methods from the
Historical records provide the following facts regarding these organizations:
Organization and Origins
Mossad: Established in 1949, Mossad’s primary mission was to protect the newly formed State of Israel and the Jewish people. A central part of its early work included hunting and capturing Nazi war criminals, such as Adolf Eichmann, rather than emulating Nazi methods.
The Abwehr: The Abwehr was the German military intelligence agency (1920–1945). By 1935, Nazi racial laws (the Nuremberg Laws) prohibited Jews from serving in the military. While some individuals of partial Jewish descent (Mischlinge) served in the Wehrmacht, they were generally required to hide their ancestry or receive special “Aryanization” certificates from high-ranking Nazis.
Jewish Representation in the Abwehr
The Abwehr was not “heavily Jewish”. Under Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, it was known for being less ideologically Nazi than the Gestapo and even assisted a small number of Jews in escaping Germany under the guise of intelligence operations.
Canaris himself was eventually executed by the Nazis for his role in the German resistance and plots to assassinate Hitler.
Antisemitic Tropes
The imagery used in the claim—referring to “Nazi sadism” and “Russian garlic scent”—parallels long-standing antisemitic rhetoric:
Conspiracy Myths: Alleging that Jews secretly control or inhabit the structures of their oppressors (such as the Nazi regime) is a common theme in literature like The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
Ethnic Slurs: References to scents like garlic have been historically used in Europe and Russia as derogatory markers to marginalize Jewish communities.
– Google Search  google.com/search?q=Mossad+i…

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Jan 4, 2026

#Mossad under  #Netanyahu and  #YossiCohen (his hair apparent) became the very aggressive organization with the global ambitions – Google Search  google.com/search?q=Mossad+u…

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Jan 4, 2026

#ADL – Anti-Defamation League vs  #FBI

The FBI recently ended its long-standing partnership with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in October 2025, a significant shift from previous collaborations where the ADL trained agents on combating  #antisemitism and extremism. FBI Director Kash Patel severed ties, citing concerns that the ADL had become a “political front” spying on conservatives, particularly after the ADL included right-wing figures like Charlie Kirk in its extremism glossary, a move praised by figures like Elon Musk and criticized by the ADL, which maintains its commitment to fighting hate. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Key Points of the Separation:

Trigger: The immediate cause was criticism from conservative influencers regarding the ADL’s inclusion of right-wing figures in its “Glossary of Extremism,” leading Patel to end the partnership.
Patel’s Stance: He accused the ADL of political bias, spying on Americans, and having problematic ties to former FBI Director James Comey, ending an era of cooperation.
ADL’s Response: The ADL expressed deep concern, stating the move would embolden extremists and noting the decision’s timing amidst rising antisemitism.
Historical Context: The partnership dated back decades, with the ADL providing crucial training and intelligence on hate groups, but this decision marks a major break, shifting FBI priorities. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

The ADL’s Role & Controversy:

Mission: The ADL is a prominent Jewish civil rights organization focused on fighting antisemitism, bigotry, and extremism.
Accusations: Conservatives, including Patel and Musk, argue the ADL has become a partisan entity targeting them, while the ADL defends its role as a watchdog. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Implications:

Shift in FBI Focus: The split signals a significant change in the FBI’s approach to partnering with civil rights groups to track domestic extremism.
Increased Polarization: The decision reflects ongoing political tensions and debates over who constitutes an extremist and the role of such watchdogs. [1, 2, 4, 6]

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1]  youtube.com/watch?v=a2FwltyT…
[2]  aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/5…
[3]  aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/2…
[4]  theguardian.com/us-news/2025…
[5]  jstreet.org/press-releases/j…
[6]  columbiamissourian.com/opini…

– Google Search  google.com/search?q=ADL+-+An…

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Jan 4, 2026

#ADL – Anti-Defamation League vs  #FBI

The “vs.” in ADL vs. FBI refers to FBI Director  #KashPatel‘s October 2025 decision to end long-standing partnerships with the ADL (Anti-Defamation League) and SPLC, citing accusations from conservatives, including Elon Musk, that the ADL functions as a “political front” spying on Americans and targeting conservatives, which Patel deemed inappropriate for FBI collaboration, despite the ADL’s historical role in training agents against antisemitism. This split reflects a shift in FBI priorities under the Trump administration, ending decades of cooperation with these groups that monitor extremism. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Background of the Partnership:

For decades, the ADL partnered with the FBI, providing training on antisemitism and extremism, with FBI agents even visiting the Holocaust Museum through ADL programs.
The FBI viewed the ADL as a valuable source of intelligence on extremist threats, as noted in past positive remarks by former FBI Director James Comey. [1, 5, 6]

The Breakup (October 2025):

Reason for the Split: FBI Director Kash Patel announced the end of ties, accusing the ADL of being a “political front masquerading as a watchdog”.
Catalyst: The decision followed conservative criticism, notably from Elon Musk, who accused the ADL of targeting Christians and being biased, especially after the ADL included right-wing activist Charlie Kirk in its “Glossary of Extremism”.
Patel’s Stance: Patel argued that the ADL’s actions, including tracking conservatives, constituted spying and made them unfit for partnership, ending an era of collaboration. [1, 2, 3, 5]

ADL’s Response:

The ADL expressed deep respect for the FBI but noted the concerning timing amidst rising antisemitism.
The organization maintains it respects the law and Constitution, countering accusations of spying. [5, 7, 8]

Wider Context:

This move also involved cutting ties with the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), another group tracking extremism, signaling a significant change in how the FBI engages with civil society groups monitoring hate. [3, 9]

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1]  aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/5…
[2]  aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/2…
[3]  theguardian.com/us-news/2025…
[4]  axios.com/2025/10/04/trump-f…
[5]  youtube.com/watch?v=a2FwltyT…
[6]  youtube.com/watch?v=JnFsBs-L…
[7]  jstreet.org/press-releases/j…
[8]  nytimes.com/1993/10/24/us/an…
[9]  philanthropy.com/news/fbi-cu…

– Google Search  google.com/search?q=ADL+-+An…

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Jan 4, 2026

ADL – Anti-Defamation League vs FBI

The FBI recently ended its long-standing partnership with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in October 2025, a significant shift from previous collaborations where the ADL trained agents on combating antisemitism and extremism. FBI Director Kash Patel severed ties, citing concerns that the ADL had become a “political front” spying on conservatives, particularly after the ADL included right-wing figures like Charlie Kirk in its extremism glossary, a move praised by figures like Elon Musk and criticized by the ADL, which maintains its commitment to fighting hate. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Key Points of the Separation:

Trigger: The immediate cause was criticism from conservative influencers regarding the ADL’s inclusion of right-wing figures in its “Glossary of Extremism,” leading Patel to end the partnership.
Patel’s Stance: He accused the ADL of political bias, spying on Americans, and having problematic ties to former FBI Director James Comey, ending an era of cooperation.
ADL’s Response: The ADL expressed deep concern, stating the move would embolden extremists and noting the decision’s timing amidst rising antisemitism.
Historical Context: The partnership dated back decades, with the ADL providing crucial training and intelligence on hate groups, but this decision marks a major break, shifting FBI priorities. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

The ADL’s Role & Controversy:

Mission: The ADL is a prominent Jewish civil rights organization focused on fighting antisemitism, bigotry, and extremism.
Accusations: Conservatives, including Patel and Musk, argue the ADL has become a partisan entity targeting them, while the ADL defends its role as a watchdog. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Implications:

Shift in FBI Focus: The split signals a significant change in the FBI’s approach to partnering with civil rights groups to track domestic extremism.
Increased Polarization: The decision reflects ongoing political tensions and debates over who constitutes an extremist and the role of such watchdogs. [1, 2, 4, 6]

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1]  youtube.com/watch?v=a2FwltyT…
[2]  aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/5…
[3]  aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/2…
[4]  theguardian.com/us-news/2025…
[5]  jstreet.org/press-releases/j…
[6]  columbiamissourian.com/opini…

– Google Search  google.com/search?q=ADL+-+An…

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Jan 4, 2026

share.google/aimode/wkTDkmhk…
1993 San Francisco spying  #scandal where an  #ADL employee was found to have monitored political groups.
#RoyBullock, had systematically monitored and collected confidential data on thousands of individuals and nearly 1,000 political http://organizations.
In 1993, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was at the center of a major spying scandal in San Francisco after investigations revealed that a long-time contract investigator,
Key Figures and Operations
Roy Bullock (“Cal”): A San Francisco art dealer who worked for the ADL for nearly 40 years as an undercover operative. He used the code name “Cal” and was paid through a secret bank account held in a false name to mask his connection to the ADL.
Tom Gerard: A San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) officer and former CIA agent who collaborated with Bullock. Gerard provided Bullock with access to confidential law enforcement records, including criminal histories and driver’s license data.
Methodology: Bullock infiltrated political groups, picked through trash, and obtained illegal government documents. He successfully posed as a supporter of various causes, once even leading an Arab-American delegation to meet with Rep. Nancy Pelosi.
Scope of Surveillance
Investigators seized roughly 12,000 files on individuals and 950 organizations. While the ADL’s stated mission was to monitor hate groups like the KKK, the files included a wide range of mainstream and progressive groups:
Civil Rights & Labor: NAACP, ACLU, United Farm Workers, and the Rainbow Coalition.
Advocacy Groups: Greenpeace, ACT UP, the Asian Law Caucus, and the American Indian Movement.
Targeted Demographics: Arab-American organizations, anti-apartheid activists, and critics of the Israeli government were primary targets.
Intelligence Sharing: Bullock admitted to selling information to agents of the South African government (during apartheid) for cash. It was also alleged that information was passed to the Israeli government.
Legal Outcome and Settlement
Criminal Case: In November 1993, the San Francisco District Attorney dropped the criminal investigation against the ADL. In exchange, the ADL paid up to $75,000 to fund hate-crime programs and agreed not to obtain confidential information from California government employees.
Civil Lawsuits: Multiple lawsuits were filed by affected  groups.In 1996, the ADL settled a class-action suit with several minority and activist groups for $200,000.
In 1999, a federal judge issued a permanent injunction prohibiting the ADL from future illegal spying on Arab-American and civil rights groups.
In 2002, a separate suit by three individual activists (Zeltzer, Blankfort, and Poirier) was settled for approximately $50,000 each.

New Details of Extensive ADL Spy Operation Emerge : Inquiry: Transcripts reveal nearly 40 years of …

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Jan 4, 2026