World News – 2024 – Video Playlist | Video Playlists | Sites: | newsandtimes.org | links-newsandtimes.com | worldwebtimes.com | southcaucasusnews.com | russianworld.net | jossica.com | octobersurprise2016.org | bklyntimes.com | oceanavenuenews.com | fbireform.com | bloggersunite.net | octobersurprise-2024.org | Trump-News.org | Audio-Posts.com | Bklyn-NY.com | Posts Review – newsandtimes.org | Capitol-Riot.com |
The News And Times Review – NewsAndTimes.org
CIA INVESTIGATION OF 9/11
Did the CIA conduct its own non-public internal investigations of the 9/11 attacks? – Google Search google.com/search?q=Did+the+…
Yes, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) conducted internal investigations into its performance and accountability surrounding the September 11, 2001, attacks. [1, 2]Key Investigations and Findings
The CIA Inspector General’s Review: At the request of the House and Senate intelligence committees (following their Joint Inquiry), the CIA Office of Inspector General (OIG) formed an internal Accountability Review Team to examine pre-9/11 counterterrorism efforts. [1]
The Helgerson Report (2005): Led by Inspector General John Helgerson, the report concluded that senior agency officials—including former Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet and former Deputy Director of Operations James Pavitt—failed to adequately resource and manage the strategic threat posed by al-Qaeda. The review found systemic failures in sharing and analyzing data rather than a single point of failure. [1, 2]
DCI Review Group: Immediately after the attacks, a DCI Review Group gathered internal documents and timelines to evaluate what the agency knew and when. [1]Public vs. Non-Public Status
Classification: The comprehensive OIG accountability report—titled OIG Report on CIA Accountability With Respect to the 9/11 Attacks—was completed as a classified document (Top Secret/SCI) in 2005. [1, 2]
Partial Release: While the full findings remained restricted for years, an executive summary and portions of the report were eventually declassified and made available through the CIA Freedom of Information Act Electronic Reading Room. [1]
Discipline: Despite the inspector general’s critical findings and recommendations for accountability reviews, then-CIA Director Porter Goss decided against pursuing formal disciplinary actions against senior officials, citing concerns over agency morale. [1]— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Oct 27, 2026

