#CIA CIA #FBI FBI #Mossad Mossad Ariel Sharon’s illness and the CIA Investigation of 9/11 Attacks: Is there any connection? – Search The CIA did conduct its own investigation of 9/11, it “was completed as a classified document in June 2005, and the declassified version was released in March 2015.” The Pulsa diNura A group of conservative Rabbis, led by Yosef Dayan, placed an ancient curse on Sharon known as the Pulsa diNura, calling on the Angel of Death to intervene and kill him. Yes, in July 2005, a group of far-right extremist activists and rabbis led by Yosef Dayan held a Pulsa diNura (Aramaic for “lashes of fire”) ceremony against Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. The ritual was perf

#CIA CIA  #FBI FBI  #Mossad Mossad

Ariel  Sharon’s illness and the CIA Investigation of 9/11 Attacks: Is there any connection? – Search 

The CIA did conduct its own investigation of 9/11, it “was completed as a classified document in June 2005, and the declassified version was released in March 2015.”

The Pulsa diNura
A group of conservative Rabbis, led by Yosef Dayan, placed an ancient curse on Sharon known as the Pulsa diNura, calling on the Angel of Death to intervene and kill him.
Yes, in July 2005, a group of far-right extremist activists and rabbis led by Yosef Dayan held a Pulsa diNura (Aramaic for “lashes of fire”) ceremony against Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. The ritual was performed in an ancient cemetery in Rosh Pina, Israel, to implore the “angels of destruction” to kill Sharon within a year. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Sharon was hospitalized on 18 December 2005, following a minor ischemic stroke. (W)
He was given medication, and in about two weeks he hd a major stroke.
Medical error ‘may have caused Sharon’s stroke’ | Ariel Sharon | The Guardian
x.com/mikenov/status/2115110…

Hemorrhagic strokes can be caused by rat poison –  GS
If you or someone else has swallowed rat poison or is showing signs of severe bleeding or stroke (such as sudden weakness, trouble speaking, or severe head pain), call emergency services (like 911) or contact Poison Control immediately.

These events were preceded by the allegations of bribery against his sons.
–

Did the CIA conduct its own non-public internal investigations of the 9/11 attacks? – GS

Yes, the CIA conducted a massive, non-public internal investigation into its own systemic and individual failures surrounding the 9/11 attacks. Initiated in 2003 at the request of congressional intelligence committees, the investigation was carried out by the CIA’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) and resulted in a nearly 500-page highly classified report completed in June 2005. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The report remained closely guarded and entirely hidden from the public for years until a heavily redacted executive summary was released in 2007, followed by a larger declassification of the documents in 2015. [1, 2]
The core functions and findings of the CIA’s internal probe include:

🎯 Scope and Focus

Accountability Review: Unlike the public 9/11 Commission, which mapped out the overarching narrative of the attacks, the CIA’s internal OIG team was explicitly tasked with determining whether specific Agency employees should be held legally or professionally accountable for failures preceding the attacks. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Review Scale: A dedicated Accountability Review Team spent over two years reviewing tens of thousands of documents and conducting numerous internal interviews. [1, 2]

⚠️ Key Findings & Failures

No “Silver Bullet”: The OIG concluded there was no single “point of failure” or hidden clue that would have definitively allowed the CIA to predict or prevent the attacks. [1]
Systemic Failure to Share Intelligence: The report sharply faulted the CIA for failing to properly analyze critical data and for not sharing intelligence with other agencies. Most notably, the CIA failed to inform the FBI when it learned that two future hijackers (Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar) had entered the United States. [1, 2]
Strategic Blindspots: The investigation revealed that the CIA had not produced a comprehensive strategic assessment of the al-Qaeda threat since 1993, and had never officially evaluated the potential for terrorists to use commercial aircraft as weapons. [1]

⚖️ Recommendations and Friction

Targeting Leadership: The Inspector General recommended that then-CIA Director George Tenet and other senior officials face an independent accountability board to review their job performance. [1]
Internal Pushback: The report caused immense friction inside the agency. George Tenet fiercely rejected the findings, calling the accusations unsupportable and arguing they ignored the aggressive actions the CIA had taken against al-Qaeda before 2001. Ultimately, subsequent CIA directors declined to empanel the recommended accountability boards, meaning no agency officials were formally disciplined as a result of the internal probe. [1, 2]Michael Novakhov (@mikenov)Medical error ‘may have caused Sharon’s stroke’ | Ariel Sharon | The Guardian  theguardian.com/world/2006/a…—  https://x.com/mikenov/status/2115110956498145530

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Oct 27, 2026