Categories
Michael Novakhov - SharedNewsLinks℠

Vance says military aid, mineral deal could be resurrected if Ukrainians talk to Trump ‘privately’ about peace deal


Michael_Novakhov
shared this story
from [Untitled].

Vice President JD Vance said Tuesday that the Trump administration would restart military aid to Ukraine and formalize a framework mineral rights deal if Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and his team talk “privately” with the US about negotiating a peace deal.

President Trump “wants the Ukrainians to come to the negotiating table,” the VP told reporters at the Capitol ahead of Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress.

“I think the president is still committed to the mineral deal. I think we’ve heard some positive things, but not yet, of course, a signature from our friends in Ukraine,” Vance went on, describing the agreement as “important” to Trump.

“I think when the Ukrainians come to the negotiating table, everything is on the table,” Vance, 40, said when asked about the resumption of military aid that the White House ordered paused Monday evening.

Zelensky met with Trump and Vance at the White House on Friday in anticipation of inking an understanding that would have created a joint US-Ukraine fund dedicated to extracting key minerals in the war-torn country.

Trump had touted the deal as a way to “get back” the billions of dollars the US had given to Ukraine since Russia’s invasion in February 2022, and Zelensky had celebrated the agreement as a means of getting a form of “security” through the presence of American businessmen on the ground.

But the deal quickly fell through after Trump, Zelensky and Vance got into a heated argument in the Oval Office about further security guarantees, with the VP and Trump accusing the Ukrainian president of being “disrespectful.”

Zelensky has since said repeatedly that he would still sign the mineral deal, writing on X on Tuesday that it’s “time to make things right,” but Trump has not spoken to him since the blowup.

Vance, at the Capitol, said the Trump team was less concerned about “public statements” than private indications the Ukrainians were willing to “meaningfully engage.”

“The public stuff doesn’t matter nearly as much as, ‘What are the Ukrainians doing to meaningfully engage on what a peaceful settlement would look like?’” he explained. “We need the Ukrainians to come to us privately and say, ‘This is what we need, this is what we want, this is how we’re going to participate in the process to end this conflict.’”

“That lack of private engagement is what is most concerning to us,” Vance added.

It was unclear as of midday Tuesday whether any communication had taken place between the administrations in Washington and Kyiv.

“Our meeting in Washington, at the White House on Friday, did not go the way it was supposed to be. It is regrettable that it happened this way. It is time to make things right. We would like future cooperation and communication to be constructive,” the Ukrainian president wrote on X Tuesday morning.

“Regarding the agreement on minerals and security, Ukraine is ready to sign it in any time and in any convenient format. We see this agreement as a step toward greater security and solid security guarantees, and I truly hope it will work effectively.”

Categories
Michael Novakhov - SharedNewsLinks℠

China, Russia Target Disgruntled Americans Fired by DOGE: Report


Michael_Novakhov
shared this story
.

Top stories

Categories
Michael Novakhov - SharedNewsLinks℠

Trump Suspends Military Aid to Ukraine After Oval Office Blowup


Michael_Novakhov
shared this story
.

Categories
Michael Novakhov - SharedNewsLinks℠

Trump suspends military aid to Ukraine after White House clash with Zelensky


Michael_Novakhov
shared this story
from The Times of Israel.

WASHINGTON (AFP) — US President Donald Trump suspended military aid to Ukraine on Monday, a White House official said, sharply escalating pressure on Kyiv to agree to peace negotiations with Russia.

The move comes just days after a stunning public clash between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Trump, who is seeking a rapid end to the war.

Trump earlier on Monday had declined to rule out a pause when quizzed by reporters, but any disruption in the flow of US arms to the frontline would rapidly weaken Ukraine’s chance of beating back the Russian invasion.

“The president has been clear that he is focused on peace. We need our partners to be committed to that goal as well,” a White House official told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity.

“We are pausing and reviewing our aid to ensure that it is contributing to a solution,” the official added.

Get The Times of Israel’s Daily Edition
by email and never miss our top stories

By signing up, you agree to the terms

Trump on Monday also warned he would “not put up” much longer with Zelensky’s defiant stance, and said the Ukrainian leader should be “more appreciative” of US support.

Speaking at the White House, Trump said Zelensky “won’t be around very long” without a ceasefire deal with Moscow.

US President Donald Trump speaks at the White House in Washington on March 3, 2025. (Roberto Schmidt/AFP)

The pause has gone into effect immediately and affects hundreds of millions of dollars of weaponry in the process of being sent to Ukraine, the New York Times reported.

Zelensky for his part said Monday he was seeking for the war to end “as soon as possible.”

The comment came after the Ukrainian president accused Russia — which invaded Ukraine in 2014 and greatly expanded the conflict in 2022 — of not being serious about peace.

Zelensky insisted that tough security guarantees were the only way to end the conflict.

But Trump’s stance has upended US support for Ukraine, and Washington’s allies more broadly, and stoked concern about the United States pivoting to Russia.

European support

After weekend crisis talks in London, Britain and France are investigating how to propose a one-month truce “in the air, at sea and on energy infrastructure” — potentially backstopped by troops on the ground.

Zelensky said discussions were still focusing on the “first steps,” adding: “An agreement on ending the war is very, very far away” — a comment that angered Trump.

Zelensky added in a video statement Monday that “real, honest peace” would only come with security guarantees for Ukraine, which agreed to denuclearize in 1994 only in exchange for protection provided by the United States and Britain.

“It was the lack of security guarantees for Ukraine 11 years ago that allowed Russia to start with the occupation of Crimea and the war in Donbas, then the lack of security guarantees allowed Russia to launch a full-scale invasion,” Zelensky said.

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky at the European leaders’ summit to discuss Ukraine, hosted by Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer, at Lancaster House, London, March 2, 2025. (Justin Tallis/Pool via AP)

Russia dismissed his comments, accusing him of not wanting peace — echoing US criticisms after he was shouted down in the Oval Office on Friday.

On the ground, Ukrainian officials reported fatalities from a Russian missile strike on a military training facility, some 130 kilometers (80 miles) from the front line.

A respected military blogger said between 30 and 40 soldiers were killed and 90 more wounded in the attack near Dnipro on Saturday.

‘Deliberate escalation?’

Trump has previously called Zelensky, president since 2019, a “dictator” for not holding elections, even though martial law precludes any vote because of the war.

Zelensky dismissed calls for him to resign, repeating his pledge to do so only if Ukraine were given NATO membership, which Russia — and now the United States under Trump — opposes.

In Moscow, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov blamed Zelensky for Friday’s White House blow-up with Trump and Vice President JD Vance, saying he “demonstrated a complete lack of diplomatic abilities.”

“He doesn’t want peace,” Peskov told reporters.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, speaks with Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov during an extended meeting at the summit of the heads of state of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, October 8, 2024. (Sergei Ilnitsky/Pool Photo via AP)

But Germany’s likely next chancellor, Friedrich Merz, said the astonishing clash was a “deliberate escalation” by Trump.

US and Russian officials have held talks on ending the war, enraging Ukraine and Europe for being sidelined, and prompting fears in Kyiv and beyond that any deal could threaten the country’s future.

Zelensky triggered Trump and Vance’s ire by questioning whether Russia could be trusted to uphold a truce.

It’s not (only) about you.

Supporting The Times of Israel isn’t a transaction for an online service, like subscribing to Netflix. The ToI Community is for people like you who care about a common good: ensuring that balanced, responsible coverage of Israel continues to be available to millions across the world, for free.

Sure, we’ll remove all ads from your page and you’ll unlock access to some excellent Community-only content. But your support gives you something more profound than that: the pride of joining something that really matters. 


Join the Times of Israel Community


Join our Community

Already a member? Sign in to stop seeing this

Categories
Michael Novakhov - SharedNewsLinks℠

Exclusive | Inside the Brooklyn mega-mansion that stole the show in ‘Anora’: ‘It’s the jewel of New York City’


Michael_Novakhov
shared this story
from [Untitled].

The Oscar-winning film “Anora” may be fictitious — but the over-the-top mansion prominently featured in it certainly exists in real life.

Priced at a staggering $30 million when it first hit the market more than a decade ago, this 14,000-square-foot Brooklyn behemoth — once home to a Russian heiress dubbed “Russia’s Paris Hilton” — is now basking in its own limelight. 

In the wake of the movie’s many victories on Sunday night, and as film buffs and real estate aficionados alike scramble to decode its allure, this mansion’s journey from oligarch hideaway to Hollywood darling offers a window into a corner of New York City few outsiders ever get a glimpse of.

Directed by Sean Baker, who snagged Best Director for his efforts, “Anora” tells the story of Ani (Mikey Madison, newly crowned Best Actress), a street-smart stripper from Brooklyn, and Vanya (Mark Eydelshteyn), the reckless 21-year-old scion of a Russian billionaire, who’s spending time away from Russia and living in this very property.

Their rhapsodic, and star-crossed, romance unfurls against the backdrop of this jaw-dropping estate, a labyrinth of marble, mirrors, and excess that Baker stumbled upon with a Google search for “the biggest and best mansion in Brighton Beach.” 

He missed that mark by a few miles, landing instead in Mill Basin — a waterfront enclave where Russian wealth has quietly taken root for decades. Baker told Variety he found the house fairly easily, marveling at its authenticity: built by a real Russian oligarch, it was a casting coup too perfect to script.

The mansion at 2458 National Drive is, to say the least, a statement. 

The residence presently belongs to a man named Michael Davidoff, a New York-raised financier born to Russian immigrants, who nearly turned Baker away. 

Living there with his wife and seven children — ages spanning 20-month-old twins to a 25-year-old — Davidoff hesitated to lease it out. 

With a 6,000-square-foot home around the corner still in his portfolio, the roughly $30,000-a-day filming fee over nearly a month of production tipped the scales. 

“At first, I didn’t want to do it because it was a low-budget movie,” Davidoff told The Post, skeptical after previously hosting glitzier shoots. “I was kind of skeptical because I had movies shot there [before] and they weren’t low budget. But then I said to myself, ‘You know what, I really like the director and his crew.’ And then I felt very comfortable with them.”

At the very least, the film crew was very into the home’s aesthetic. Limestone, stucco and dark glass clash in a façade that evokes a Miami vice lord’s lair crossed with a sci-fi fortress. 

Inside, it’s a fever dream of opulence: five bedrooms, 4.5 baths, a 1,000-square-foot pool, a theater, staff quarters — and a garage that, in the film, showcases a fleet of luxury cars. Leather walls, a spa and a pavilion seating 40 round out the amenities, while marble — acres of it — lines bathrooms and floors. 

“There were so many rooms we didn’t even use,” production designer Stephen Phelps told Curbed, who recalls “exploring” the space like an archaeologist unearthing a lost kingdom. For Baker’s crew, it was a goldmine. They barely touched the decorations, scavenging surreal statues and paintings from the owners to flesh out the oligarch vibe. 

“The style and the choices that were made in the construction feel real,” Phelps added.

Beyond its look, the home comes with quite the history. A woman named Anna Anisimova — the New York Magazine-anointed “Russian Paris Hilton” — lived there as a teen in the late ’90s and early 2000s. 

Now Anna Schafer, a Los Angeles-based skincare entrepreneur and aspiring actress, recalls her father, Vasily Anisimov — a billionaire with a $2.1 billion fortune, per Forbes — snagging the place in 1996 with a move straight out of a movie. 

“My dad was like, ‘Can we knock?’” she told Curbed, recounting a family drive through Mill Basin with a real estate broker. “The family opened the gate and my dad walked in, and as a joke was like, ‘Do you want to sell your house to me?’” 

What followed was surreal: “We ended up having dinner there,” Schafer added, followed by a sleepover — her family inside, the owners on their yacht. “They had this beautiful boat,” she said. 

Anisimov, a former judo buddy of Vladimir Putin who parlayed aluminum into a real estate empire, liked the dead-end seclusion. 

“There’s no through traffic,” Schafer said. “I think my dad liked how secluded it was and how private it was.”

The seller was John Rosatti, a Brooklyn-born yacht flipper and auto magnate worth an estimated $400 million three years ago, who kicked off construction in 1989. 

Rosatti, who once owned a 162-foot vessel dubbed Remember When (a “Sopranos” nod), handed it over for $3 million that same year after a spat over a deck built atop protected wetlands. 

From there, Anisimov’s wife, Galina, unleashed a 2003 overhaul, adding a third story and importing European marble to craft a primary suite Schafer still recalls fondly. 

“That was my mom’s room,” she told Curbed of the bay-view perch where she’d wake to water lapping outside. Summers meant Jet Ski jaunts with friends. “It wasn’t a terrible childhood. It was very free.”

But the fairy tale soured. After Schafer and her sister left New York, the family listed the house in 2013 for $30 million. It languished, drawing snickers for its gaudy excess and Rosatti ties — headlines Galina told her daughter broke her heart. 

By 2018, it sold for $10 million to an LLC; three years later, the Davidoffs scooped it up for $7.2 million.  

Local broker Doreen Alfano of Bergen Basin Realty confirms Anisimova’s teenage stint there and the area’s appeal. 

“It’s our best-kept secret,” she told the outlet of Mill Basin, a peninsula jutting into Jamaica Bay where docks and boats are as common as bodegas elsewhere.

That secrecy suits the area’s eclectic elite. Waterfront homes start at $2.5 million — “the bigger the house, the bigger the price tag,” Alfano quipped.

Yet it’s a trek: 45 minutes to Manhattan by car, with buses as the lifeline and the Midwood subway a 14-minute drive. Still, the perks pile up — proximity to Coney Island and Rockaway Beach, plus Lindower Park’s ballfields and pools. 

Mill Basin’s melting pot adds flavor: Italian-Americans mingle with a growing Russian contingent, Orthodox Jews, Israelis and newcomers like a Pakistani restaurateur. “There’s a big Russian community, Muslims,” Alfano said. “There’s Greek food, French food. And the schools are great.” Average homes hover at $1 million, but this cinematic gem stands apart — a relic of excess now reborn as a cultural touchstone.

When she heard that the film, centered around the mansion, had its big Oscar’s night, only one word came to mind: “proud.” 

“I was really proud because I knew every single inch of that house. And to see it in the movie, it just really made me feel so good to know that I was a part of it,” Alfano told The Post. “It was actually the location scout who had reached out to me at the time asking about it, and the owner of the house at the time didn’t live in New York, they lived in Russia.” 

In fact, Alfano revealed that the home had been in a transitional period, having just been sold to the Davidoffs.

“It was a matter of … ‘will the new owner be okay with it?’ And he most certainly was.” 

Davidoff, who snapped up the property in 2021 didn’t grasp the movie’s raw edge until he saw it. 

“I really didn’t know exactly what the film was about,” he told The Post. “And then when I saw it, I’m like, ‘He has to win an Oscar for this movie.’ And that’s exactly what happened.” 

Davidoff even let cast members crash overnight during filming and use his cars that were filmed in the movie — and now even plans a celebratory dinner with Baker and his wife, Samantha. 

Davidoff’s wife nudged him to buy the home, overriding his comfort with their prior pad.

“When I found out this [home] was for sale, I’m like, ‘You know what? I have to grab it because it’s the jewel of New York City,’” he said. “There’s nothing like it. Nothing in the five boroughs that I have seen.” 

Davidoff said the previous owners have hinted at regret at letting the home go. 

“This house is out of the ordinary. It is not an ordinary house,” he said. “I haven’t changed [anything]. Not one single thing. Because I love the architecture. The architecture is very rare. For those times. And I’m talking about 20 years ago.”

He added, “Whoever goes in that house, they fall in love with every single instrument. From the floors down to every single oak or straw or furniture. Every little single thing is custom made. Nothing that you could find in the local stores. And every piece comes from all parts of the world.” 

Categories
Michael Novakhov - SharedNewsLinks℠

Five theories behind Trump’s betrayal of Ukraine – from KGB spy to Putin stooge


Michael_Novakhov
shared this story
from Mirror – US News.

Is Donald Trump a spy – or a stooge? Five theories behind President’s Ukraine betrayal

Donald Trump’s pro-Vladimir Putin stance has triggered claims he is a Kremlin tool, a KGB-recruited agent for Russia or perhaps he just really admires authoritarian gangster bosses. Which is true?

Oval office bust-up

As the dust settles following the Oval office bust-up between the US President and Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky, allegations of Donald Trump’s shady links to Putin persist.

Serious claims Trump was signed up in the 1980’s by then KGB spies have gained root in recent years and fresh claims have recently emerged – but could he really be a spy? Trump has relentlessly refused openly to criticise Putin despite a tsunami of evidence the Russian leader is a war criminal over his vile full-scale invasion of Ukraine. He has even pressed his argument that Ukraine was somehow responsible for the war, that Zelensky ought to be more “thankful” for American help and reiterated he knows Putin.

Powered by


His warmth towards Vladimir Putin and apparent betrayal of Europe is so blatant that if he really is a Russian stooge, it is almost too obvious to be true – unless he is hiding in plain sight. And incredibly he has even suggested that he trusts Putin more than he does America’s own intelligence agencies.

Here we look at the five possible explanations for Trump’s worrying support for the Kremlin leader:

1. He is working for Russian intelligence

The claim is that he was charmed, feted and recruited by the then KGB during the 1980’s, talent-spotted as a businessman who would one day be very influential. He visited Moscow in 1987 and it is almost impossible to imagine he was not secretly filmed, perhaps leading to compromising footage for leverage. Bombshell claims by former Soviet intelligence boss Alnur Mussayev suggest the then 40-year-old New York real estate developer was given a codename ‘Krasnov’ in 1987. This was, it is claimed, part of a wave of KGB recruitments of western ‘people of influence’ to collaberate with Russia. Anthony Scaramucci, who was briefly Trump’s White House communications director in 2017, suggested that Trump’s deference to Putin has puzzled many, adding: “I think there is a mysterious ‘hold’ on the president.” Trump tried briefly for the US Presidency in the 1980’s and openly criticised NATO after this period. These are compelling claims which Trump has always denied.

2. He’s just a Putin patsy

Here the truth might be far more subtle and likely than the above theory as Trump is too unreliable, irrational and uncontrollabe for the KGB to trust he could handle the pressure of life undercover for years as a serious asset, learning counter-surveillance and old-school techniques. But they may have charmed and flattered him, financially benefited him, played upon his ego, perhaps even via his appetite for beautiful women and made him a “passive agent.” in other words- he does not know or perhaps does not care that he has been manipulated into supporting Putin on behalf of Russian intelligence . But he has been persuaded and influenced to such a degree that he really believes Russian President Vladimir Putin is in the right and because of his arrogance is happy to push this theory and not care a jot that the view is unacceptable to European allies. His arrogance and possible psychopathy may also mean Trump does not feel danger and that it does not matter he is so obviously hazardously warm towards to the Kremlin.

3. He just hates Zelensky

Perhaps he simply hates Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky because the Ukrainian President refused to play ball when asked by Trump in 2019 to help him dish dirt on the Biden family, via Hunter’s business deals in Ukraine. This attempt was driven by former New York Mayor Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s then lawyer. It centred upon unproven allegations Joe Biden had corrupt dealings with Ukraine as vice-president. Kyiv intelligence says money paid to three Ukrainian men to help this inquiry was paid by Russian military intelligence (GRU). This was aimed at spreading the lie that Ukraine, rather than Russia, interfered in the recent US elections.Trump pushed for Ukrainian lawmakers to investigate Hunter Biden, most famously in a phone call with President Zelensky, but the Ukrainian leader declined. So perhaps for Trump it’s personal and he wants revenge – at any cost, even to his own country.

4. It’s financial – Trump has been on the take

Powered by


Even more likely: As a former intelligence officer tells: “It has to be financial” and he has benefited from real-estate dealings in the US, with Russian ‘businessmen’ or mafia involving themselves in Trump’s property empire. This could hugely compromise him and threatening to bring down his wealth and power if he does not play ball. There are also possible links to the Russian and US mob. In Russia the mafia and the modern KGB, the FSB are much more closely linked now and Putin runs the country like a mob boss, taking 50% of every major business deal.

Promoted Stories

5. It’s all of the above

Russia has changed hugely since the 1980’s and grown into a shady gangster-run crime venture, with the mafia and underworld gelling with Moscow’s intelligence agencies. Trump’s relationship with Russia may now be undefiined but he is swayed hugely because of his ego, fears a secret may come out, financially benefiting from Russia links. Agents recruited to work for Russian intelligence and other agencies can take many forms and in the ensuing years since the 1980’s the Soviet Union collapsed and intelligence workers moved on, some perhaps keeping up their contacts in a different guise. Now Trump may be an “agent of influence”.

Crucially Trump appears to fawn over strongman authoritarians with leanings towards fascism – and he hates Zelensky so much that he cannot hide his feelings. He is notoriously thin-skinned and hates being opposed. Zelenksy’s tough defence of his country and demands for a security backstop in a peace deal with Russia has put a temporary glitch in the way of Trump’s desire to look like he can sort out the deal – hugely escalating his enmity towards the Ukrainian leader.

Categories
Michael Novakhov - SharedNewsLinks℠

Netanyahu Thanks Trump for Weapons to ‘Finish the Job’ Against Iran Axis


Michael_Novakhov
shared this story
from The Defense Post.

Categories
Michael Novakhov - SharedNewsLinks℠

Europe wants to broker peace in Ukraine — and between Trump and Kyiv after the White House fiasco


Michael_Novakhov
shared this story
.

European leaders pose for a family photograph at Lancaster House during the European leaders’ summit on March 2, 2025 in London, England. 

Wpa Pool | Getty Images News | Getty Images

European allies put forward their own peacekeeping plans for Ukraine at the weekend, as well as attempting to position the region as a mediator between Kyiv and the White House after the blistering public attack on Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the Oval Office last Friday.

European leaders met in London on Sunday for a hastily convened summit that aimed to show a united front regarding Ukraine, and to present proposals aiming to keep Europe relevant to, and in the middle of, any future peace talks. Europe has been largely sidelined in such discussions in recent weeks, amid a rapprochement between Russia and the U.S.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said after the gathering on Sunday that a “number” of allies had signed up to a “coalition of the willing” that was ready to commit peacekeeping troops to Ukraine in the event of a peace deal.

The U.K. insisted that the plan would be presented to the U.S. and that European allies would work to get Washington’s support for its proposals, which it said offered Ukraine much-coveted security guarantees.

“Through my discussions over recent days, we’ve agreed that the U.K., France and others will work with Ukraine on a plan to stop the fighting. Then we’ll discuss that plan with the United States and take it forward together,” Starmer told the BBC on Sunday.

Watch: Trump-Zelenskyy Oval Office meeting explodes into a shouting match

Several media reports suggested that Starmer and his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron had promoted the idea of an initial one-month truce between Ukraine and Russia to test if Russia was committed to any future peace deal.

CNBC has contacted Downing Street and the Elysee Palace for comment.

Europe has been scrambling to assert its role in future peacemaking, after U.S. and Russian officials began talks two weeks ago, which they said were aimed at laying the groundwork for discussions to end the war.

Meanwhile, tensions between Washington and Kyiv have risen to a boiling point, culminating in a spectacular public dressing-down of Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelenskyy last Friday by U.S. officials, including President Donald Trump and VP JD Vance. Amid heated remarks, the U.S. politicians accused Kyiv’s leadership of being ungrateful for U.S. aid and of “gambling with World War III,” which Zelenskyy denied.

Wait-and-see mode

Analysts say there is currently little detail on Europe’s proposals to achieve a lasting peace in Ukraine and scant understanding of which countries would be involved in such efforts. Russia has refused to countenance the idea of European troops on Ukrainian soil, while the U.S. insists that no American troops would be deployed to the country as peacekeepers.

Gesine Weber, fellow at the German Marshall Fund, told CNBC on Monday that the latest summit showed Europeans now really see the need to take the lead on support for Ukraine, “especially as tensions between the U.S. and Ukraine could not be higher.”

“We’re now basically in a wait-and-see position as to what extent Washington can be brought on board with this plan that they’re presented with,” she told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe.”

Read more

European allies have struggled to reach a general consensus on military aid for Ukraine during its three-year war with Russia, as well as what its future role might be in the country once the conflict has ended, given the continent’s broader security needs. Ukraine is currently part of neither the NATO military alliance, nor the European Union.

European allies have recently repeatedly discussed need to increase defense spending, aiming to signal to Trump that they — and NATO — are worth persevering with after persistent criticism from the U.S. that continental allies are over-reliant on the States for protection.

The U.S. and Russia have not yet publicly reacted to the latest meeting of European allies, although Trump posted on Truth Social on Sunday that “we should spend less time worrying about Putin” and more time concerned about crime, “so that we don’t end up like Europe.”

U.S. President Donald Trump attends a meeting with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg ahead of the NATO summit in Watford, in London, Britain, December 3, 2019.

Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

Without U.S. support or Russia’s acquiescence, analysts say Europe could find its peacekeeping proposals falling flat very quickly.

“After the London summit on Ukraine, the concrete outcomes are limited. Apart from new air defense missiles and financial aid … Starmer announced a follow-up meeting. The next task will be to substantiate, beyond the U.K. and France, the ‘coalition of the willing’ of countries ready to deploy troops to Ukraine,” Carsten Nickel, deputy director of research at risk consultancy Teneo, said in a note on Sunday.

Success will depend primarily on the U.S. and Russia, Nickel added, noting a key question to watch is whether European troops in Ukraine and any potential U.S. security backstop motivate Russia to reject peace talks.

“In turn, this creates risks regarding the US administration’s stance, given President Donald Trump’s desire for a quick ceasefire. The European plea for involvement potentially complicates the equation between Russia and the U.S. It contrasts with Trump’s position that a minerals extraction deal would be sufficient to prevent Russia from launching a renewed invasion,” Nickel said.

Categories
Michael Novakhov - SharedNewsLinks℠

Netanyahu thanks Trump for weapons to ‘finish the job’ against Iran axis


Michael_Novakhov
shared this story
.

Categories
Michael Novakhov - SharedNewsLinks℠

Israel lobbying US to retain Russia’s presence in Syria to counter Turkiye’s influence


Michael_Novakhov
shared this story
from Comments for Middle East Monitor.

Israel has reportedly been lobbying the United States to help maintain Russia’s presence in post-Assad Syria, in an attempt to keep the new Syrian authorities weak and counter Turkiye’s influence in the country.

According to Reuters news agency, which cited four unnamed sources familiar with the developments, Israel has held meetings with senior US officials in Washington and with American congressional representatives in Israel over the past month to convey Tel Aviv’s fears regarding Syria’s new authorities.

Since the rebel takeover of Syria and the collapse of the late Assad regime almost three months ago, Israeli officials have repeatedly expressed their concerns over the country’s new government and its national and regional ambitions, with Israeli forces having occupied more of Syrian territory south of the capital Damascus over those months.

Aside from meetings with American officials, Israeli officials also reportedly made their views clear to the US in a “white paper” they wrote up, reiterating apparent fears of the security threat the new Syrian authorities and former rebels could allegedly pose to Tel Aviv.

OPINION: How will the new Syria handle its ‘Greater Israel’ problem?

A primary Israeli policy goal, according to the sources, is to now keep Syria divided and decentralised, with a key focus on countering Turkish influence increasingly embedding itself throughout the newly-liberated country, particularly amid Ankara’s diplomatic, security, and infrastructural assistance to the new authorities in Damascus.

One effective way of achieving those goals, in the eyes of Tel Aviv, is reportedly to seek the US’s help in facilitating Russia’s retention of its Mediterranean naval base in Tartus and its Hmeimim air base in Latakia.

According to the sources, some of those present at a meeting with US officials were surprised at Israeli officials’ belief that Russia’s continued presence would be a positive move, especially as Turkiye would – as a key NATO member state – conceptually and practically help prevent any attacks on Israel from Syria. The Israelis, however, were reportedly “adamant” toward the contrary.

READ: Israel’s occupation of southern Syria part of expansionist agenda, Turkiye FM says